Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian Release Plan
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:43:15PM -0700, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 01:25:51 -0400
> Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> > If something has been in unstable for a year and hasn't managed to
> > have few enough bugs to make it into testing, then I don't care to
> > have it in the release (either the older or newer version).
>
> But this is software that users _use_. KDE and GNOME may be bad cases
> here as they seem to be too large for rc bugs to really give a usefull
> idea on the relative stability of the software hidden behind the package
> name.
I disagree. If I'm not mistaken, this is the definition of an RC bug. If
the package has an RC bug, it is not releasable. If there is an RC bug
which does not imply that the package is unreleasable, it has been assigned
the wrong severity.
--
- mdz
Reply to: