On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote: > [...] > > [3] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/Debian/freeze > > Reading the whole "Future releases of Debian" thread, I thought that > the main idea was that Debian need a more 'readable' status for the next > stable release. > > I propose to create a meta-package called 'release-status-sarge' that > depends on packages (with version number) that we want to see in sarge. What we need, is a task management system almost like our bug tracking system. A way we can express task that have to be done before next relese or any other goal we wants to achive. A system where tasks may be splitted, merged, spowned, assigned, revoked, opened, closed, tagged. A system where tasks, like bugs, can have severities, can be handled via mail, browsed via web interface etc. That would be a system to let us to show our user what we are planning to do, how we want to achive our goal, who will work on what, discuss with them. A system i was thinkg about from time but which i had never time to implement. Looking at these discussions, i'm really considering to bould one. ciao, -- Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.
Attachment:
pgp8IinzLonor.pgp
Description: PGP signature