Re: should bugs really be closed?

[Keith Dunwoody <kstephen@interchange.ubc.ca>]

Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
>
> > I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
> > removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense.
>
>
> Could tag them with the release name that affected release name (woody,
> sarge, sid, etc...).  It's what I've done with the Jabber bug reports
> that only affect the woody release. 

Except gcc-2.96, gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3 are all available in sarge (for example), 
last time I checked...

-- Keith