On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:13:13 +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> claimed: [...] > See groff_char(7). Technically it's Latin-1, but this is planned to > change to UTF-8 for groff 2.0 (no schedule yet); groff_char(7) advises > sticking to ASCII, and I agree. You can get everything in Latin-1 > using named characters anyway without having to worry about encoding. [...] > 0xA0 is the Latin-1 non-breaking space. Bug #199422 notes that this > doesn't work in current groff. I'm not sure whether this is actually a > groff bug or not, and need to check with upstream. I suggest using '\ > ' instead anyway, though. [...] > Using .nf and .fi would probably be more sensible than large numbers > of.br requests. (Feel free to pass on this comment.) > Thanks a lot. That's exactly what I needed to know. I updated/submitted the bugs to the sf.net bug tracking system. -- ai
Attachment:
pgp6lrjI4ROpf.pgp
Description: PGP signature