Re: update-alternatives priorities for editors
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 09:21:47 +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> said:
> /usr/bin/editor is not only something invoked directly. It's also
> invoked by programs as the default editor. And, if vim is the only
> editor installed on the system, it had better be the default editor
> for such programs!
Is that not an argument for emacs also providing
/usr/bin/editor alternatives, since emacs may be the sole editor on
the system?
manoj
--
If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the
library? Lily Tomlin
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: