Re: coreutils with acl support

[Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>]

Hi, Michael Stone wrote:

> Another possibility would be an optional coreutils-acl package or
> somesuch, but I don't particularly like the idea of diversions or
> alternatives or complex dependency structures for ls et al.

What'd be the problem with a package "coreutils-acl" that just Conflicts:
and Provides: coreutils?

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
-- 
The forest is safe because a lion lives therein and the lion is safe because
it lives in a forest.  Likewise the friendship of persons rests on mutual help.
		-- Laukikanyay.