On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Nathanael Nerode (neroden@twcny.rr.com) [030721 16:20]: > > FYI, I'm one of the people who hasn't applied to become a maintainer > > because of the New Maintainer "process". I intended to do more QA work, > > but a lot of it is difficult or pointless if one isn't a DD (what fun it > > is to submit trivial one-line packaging patches which will be ignored, > > with no recourse to NMUs; and trying to clean up the disorganized web > > pages isn't a reasonable task without access), and for some of the rest > > one tends to get ignored if one isn't a DD. ("He's not a DD -- he can't > > ask for a package to be removed.") So I considered becoming a DD. But > > I looked at the current state of the NM process, and decided it wasn't > > worth it to go through the process in order to wait for months without > > response, especially since the system seems set up to encourage only > > package maintainers to apply. > > Totally true. That's e.g. the reason why announcing the removal of old > RFPs didn't appear in debian-devel-announce where it would have > belonged - the submission was rejected by the moderators for the > formal reason I'm not a DD. Did you even try to find a DD to sign it for you? -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
pgpRqkhilhQVo.pgp
Description: PGP signature