Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2003
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:01:36AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Okay, this is just broken reasoning. Nobody said they're being kept
> waiting until they're trustworthy, you just made that up.
> Far more likely is the possibility that they are people who should be
> rejected, but the DAM _knows_ that [...]
So why is it better for you to make stuff up? The whole problem here
is that people have to guess why these people are in limbo, because
no reasons are given.