Re: reverb equivalent
> > I'm getting the feeling that you're using reverb in a manner that is
> > not it's common usage, but I'll ignore that for now.
>
> We're probably not talking about the same reverb. Teso's is a two-way
> TCP port forwarder. I have no idea about what yours does :-)
'reverb' is usually something more musical than a two-way
TCP port forwarder.
> Obdevel: I intend to package reverb if I can get the permission to do
> so, and to develop a replacement if none exists.
Are you going to call it 'reverb'?
What do you mean by two-way TCP port forwarder ?
Something like tcpproxy?
... and me reads up.
I think you are talking about tcpproxy, but it does seem to have very
interesting features.
regards,
junichi
Reply to: