Re: Future releases of Debian
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 02:25:32AM +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >  This shouldn't start a "Why wasn't XFree86 4.2 included in
> > Debian 3.0?" discussion - XFree86 4.2 would have lowered the
> > problems for some time, but within half a year the problems would be
> > similar.
> Ditto for gnome/kde; gnome2 wasn't very stable when woody was released
> but today a gnome 2.0 backport has some sense.
To use GNOME 1 in Debian 3.0 was the right decision since slightly
outdated stable software is usually better than bleeding-edge buggy
software. A new stable release would give users a version of GNOME that
is both stable and more recent.
> Personally i've had some problems with XFree 4.1 that i don't have with
> X 4.2; sadly i couldn't report them in time. I mean, stable wasn't "stable"
> for me. But i'm usually a corner-case, so who cares ;)
Next year, people might have problems with XFree86 4.2 that don't occur
with XFree86 4.2. The intention of my footnote was:
You might discuss specific issues, but the general problem with heavily
outdated software remains valid.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed