Re: Bug#192869: surfraw: surprized you added so many commands to /usr/bin
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:36:15AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> > That's workable too. I don't see the objection to putting them in
> > /usr/bin/surfraw though. /usr/bin is where binaries are supposed to go.
> > /usr/lib is (mainly) for libraries, these scripts are not libraries.
> AFAIK, the FHS doesn't allow for creation of subdirectories under
> /usr/bin/. Please put the scripts under /usr/lib/surfraw instead -- if
> you have to add a directory to $PATH anyway, one directory is as good as
> another... except that one is sanctioned by policy.
/usr/share/surfraw, in that case. surfraw is Architecture: all and these
programs are shell scripts.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]