Marc Haber wrote: >>Well that's the purpose of ITP-bugs against wnpp I think, because >>they are CC'd to debian-devel for public review. > Please show me a single ITP bug number where ftpmaster has said "this > package will not go into the archive, I will reject it on upload". There's numerous ITPs where e.g. licensing (seems to be a main issue with ftpmaster) has been discussed (the last I recall is #199874 dated 2003-07-03). If you're too cool to do proper ITPs then don't complain about the debian processing for new packages not working for you. >>And since ftpmaster sent you to -devel he would obey the opinion >>of the list. > The list does not seem to have an opinion yet. Hmm. No? Cheers T.
Attachment:
pgpZKiy_RAVfG.pgp
Description: PGP signature