Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:47:32PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > >>Andrew Suffield wrote: >> >>>>people to http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy/ch-common.en.html. >>>This claims the GNU FDL is acceptable, so it's worse than useless. >>It claims that GNU FDL sans cover texts and invariant sections is acceptable. > Which is grossly out of date (read: wrong). This has been discussed to > death on -legal. ... which is much more interesting than your initial statement. Thanks for clairfying this. Cheers T.
Description: PGP signature