On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:35:50PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * (Miquel van Smoorenburg) > | Now, did the NMU follow the rules in the developers reference ? > aj opened the bug hunting season last year.. it hasn't closed yet. While this is true, Bastian didn't actually follow even the lightweight NMU policy there. >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200201/msg00014.html Note in particular from that message: ] * A maintainer upload is better than a non-maintainer upload. ] If the bug ] hasn't been filed yet, or the patch hasn't been sent to the bug, ] you almost certainly shouldn't be making an NMU... yet. ] email ] firstname.lastname@example.org with a note that says "This bug can be fixed ] by applying this patch [...]. Any NMU that results in the maintainer being irritated is a bad NMU. That doesn't necessarily stop it from also being a necessary NMU, but irritating maintainers is something to avoid wherever possible. There really isn't any reason to do an NMU without having first sent the patch to the BTS (which will notify the maintainer), and for a bug that's already been around a week without causing massive chaos, there isn't really a reason no to give the maintainer a day or two to respond to your patch before NMUing. Cheers, a "Be good to yourself, and to each other" j -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Is this some kind of psych test? Am I getting paid for this?''
Description: PGP signature