Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
From: Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:03:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030616080345.GC21588@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030616031909.GC3432@duncf.mine.nu>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0306140321480.4443@home.unex.es> <[🔎] m31xxxgesn.fsf@ulysse.nib> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0306141242320.3224@home.unex.es> <[🔎] 87n0gjsdlk.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0306151559170.10129@home.unex.es> <[🔎] m3znkj761s.fsf@wotan.nib> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0306151723590.12090@home.unex.es> <[🔎] m3llw370u3.fsf_-_@wotan.nib> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.56.0306151932470.15202@home.unex.es> <[🔎] 20030616031909.GC3432@duncf.mine.nu>

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
> negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)

Just out of curiosity, how will this be accomplished?

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
  - From: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>
- Re: Every spam is sacred
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>
- Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
  - From: Duncan Findlay <duncf@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: fewer vim variants
Next by Date: Re: Every spam is sacred
Previous by thread: Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
Next by thread: Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread