Hello,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:15:48PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Indeed, since the scanner follows the standard, the code
> produced is portable -- not following the standard is what leads to
> non portable code.
With "portable" I meant "running on a wide range of existing
machines". It is like driving your bicycle in the town: having the
law on your side when the car hits you, does not necessarily keep you
alive.
But as long as flex-old is around and produces code which is portable
in the sense above, things are fine for me.
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
Attachment:
pgp7BVZXRFew4.pgp
Description: PGP signature