Hello, On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:15:48PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Indeed, since the scanner follows the standard, the code > produced is portable -- not following the standard is what leads to > non portable code. With "portable" I meant "running on a wide range of existing machines". It is like driving your bicycle in the town: having the law on your side when the car hits you, does not necessarily keep you alive. But as long as flex-old is around and produces code which is portable in the sense above, things are fine for me. Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
Attachment:
pgp7BVZXRFew4.pgp
Description: PGP signature