Hello,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:35:53AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:51:14 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> said:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:24:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Flex no longer has support for non conforming implementations; and
> >> thus no longer has support for platforms that so not have stdint.h.
> >> In other words, behaviour of flex scanners on non conforming
> >> implementations is undefined.
> >>
> >> Please use flex-old for platforms where the implementation is not
> >> up to date.
>
> > these platforms include platforms like Solaris 9 ...
>
> Which I donot care about. (Or is Solaris 9 now a re;eased
> Debian architecture?)
I am upstream for some programs that I want to run on non-Debian
platforms, too. Does the above mean that I should not use the
"flex" package from unstable, then?
A flex package which produces non-portable code would considerably
degrade Debian's usefulness as a development platform.
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
Attachment:
pgpFBDjEJTY9e.pgp
Description: PGP signature