On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:59:07PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Mike Markley wrote: > > severity 154829 important > > thanks > > ... > > Also, this bug does NOT render the package unusable to everyone. > > I'm downgrading it to important. It's still on the radar, I just don't > > know where to go from here and upstream's been pretty inactive as of > > late. > If Debian releases for 11 architectures the package has to work on *all* > these architectures. I regard it as grave bug if it is definitley unusable > on two architectures. I do not want to start a severity ping-pong und thus > I would like to discuss this topic on devel. While I've often argued that a package's failure in specific sets of circumstances that don't occur under normal usage in most environments is not a grave bug; but I don't think failing outright on *any* of our 11 architectures qualifies. If it fails to run on an architecture that there's a binary for, that's grave. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpxVyzxdtlTN.pgp
Description: PGP signature