Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:41:45 +0200, Andreas Barth <email@example.com> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030604 08:20]:
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 21:50:45 +0200, Andreas Barth
>> <email@example.com> said:
>> > You should really accept the decision of a package maintainer.
>> Why so, if they are not doing the right thing?
> In real life there a three categories: "Right", "Wrong but
> acceptable" and "Wrong". It would be enough to not accept the
> maintainer decisions in the last case. Everything else is a waste of
Gee. Apart from the fact that the above categorization adds
nothing to this discussion (if it were acceptable we would not be
here, would we now?), all I have to say is: Guess what category I
think uninformative Changelogs belong to?
Going the speed of light is bad for your age.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C