Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:05:28 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:34:43AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > I read that entry as "the new upstream version fixes the problem
>> > reported in #193497", and looking at the BTS that is exactly its
>> > meaning.
>> I thinik a good changelog should not require one to go off to an
>> external document, remotely located, to determine what the change
> Uh? less /usr/share/doc/package/changelog.gz That ain't what I
> call "remote".
You have the full BTS in /usr/share/doc/package/changelog.gz?
For all the bugs that you close? Really?
> But yes, we should stick to our long standing tradition of good and
> informative changelogs.
Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it; get a larger hammer.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C