[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:05:28 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon
<mmagallo@debian.org> said:  

> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:34:43AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >  I read that entry as "the new upstream version fixes the problem
>> >  reported in #193497", and looking at the BTS that is exactly its
>> >  meaning.

>> I thinik a good changelog should not require one to go off to an
>> external document, remotely located, to determine what the change
>> was.

>  Uh?  less /usr/share/doc/package/changelog.gz That ain't what I
>  call "remote".

	You have the full BTS in /usr/share/doc/package/changelog.gz?
 For all the bugs that you close? Really?  

>  But yes, we should stick to our long standing tradition of good and
>  informative changelogs.

	I concur. 


Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it; get a larger hammer.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: