Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 21:50:45 +0200, Andreas Barth <email@example.com> said:
> You should really accept the decision of a package maintainer.
Why so, if they are not doing the right thing?
> However, it really might be better to put a longer statement into
> changelog. _But_ it's certainly much worse to re-open a really
> closed bug than to make a too short changelog entry.
I disagree. It is always a good idea to require proper
information about why a problem report is closed; this allows people
who read bugs-dist to weigh in with help or provide better solutions,
or document the change when the BTS has retired the old bug, or to
retain the change information in the changelog, not in a remote bug
> (BTW: You should really make cleaner why changing of the compiler
> closes the Bug 194555. The situation there is fare worse than
> here. You shouldn't flame until you're perfekt.)
You are obviously new to the traditions and mores of flammage.
If at first you don't succeed, you must be a programmer.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C