[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: texmf.cnf again

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:24:38 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>

>>  My point is that given the way the question is written, its
>>  priority and default answer seem to counter its purpose.
>        Given that were the defaults set differently this would be a
> serious bug, perhaps that says something about the purpose.

"tex configuration is broken for frontend=noninteractive" isn't

Can't update-texmf store the information whether /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
was generated by it or is user-modified in the file itself (for
example by keeping an md5sum in the first line) and do the right
             cu andreas

Reply to: