[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: package naming



On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:25:15PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> Sure, the epoch is of course necessary.  What I am wondering about is how
> katie will react if a source package is uploaded which produces a binary
> package which is already produced by another source package.
> 
> I.e., is there any thing one would need to be careful about, or
> does this Just Work?

It won't install the new package if the old one isn't removed first, but
if you upload the -cvs flavour at the same time as the normal one, the
binary package in the 'wrong' source package will go away, and problems
will solve themselves.

-- 
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org
"An expert can usually spot the difference between a fake charge and a
full one, but there are plenty of dead experts." 
  -- National Geographic Channel, in a documentary about large African beasts.

Attachment: pgplWcqSlogm9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: