Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")
* Rene Engelhard (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030602 01:05]:
> > However, it really might be better to put a longer statement into
> > changelog. _But_ it's certainly much worse to re-open a really closed
> > bug than to make a too short changelog entry. (BTW: You should really
> a wrongly closed... (whithout explanation what the fix was; the
Was the bug still there? No. So it was right to close the bug
despite the fact that _you_ didn't like the changelog-style.
> > make cleaner why changing of the compiler closes the Bug 194555. The
> > situation there is fare worse than here. You shouldn't flame until
> > you're perfekt.)
> aha. You say me I should respect the decision and you don't.
I didn't reopen your bug report. And - I would never spoken about that
here unless you bashed a debian maintainer here and reopend a really
> I actually am really busy with other Debian and RL things...
Perhaps you just shouldn't try to enforce your point of view. That
would make it easier.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C