Re: new bug tags

[Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>]

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:33:29PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> 
> > I don't; it's silly.  At best you'll get an architecture tag for the
> > arch that the buildd maintainer reported the bug on, but that's it.
> > An inaccurate architecture tag is worse than useless, it's misleading.
> > Just parse wanna-build's failed logs; it's trivial.
> 
> Something that would be really useful would be to open up the ability to
> annotate the buildd logs more widely.  I've often felt that the buildd
> logs would be a lot more useful if they linked into the BTS more often.

Hmm, there's a unique URL for each buildd log.  You could just add this
URL to the bug report and the reader would have an easy time getting to
it, assuming he's online, though.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same.  -- Barne's Law

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.