[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: new bug tags

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:33:29PM +0100, James Troup wrote:

> I don't; it's silly.  At best you'll get an architecture tag for the
> arch that the buildd maintainer reported the bug on, but that's it.
> An inaccurate architecture tag is worse than useless, it's misleading.
> Just parse wanna-build's failed logs; it's trivial.

Something that would be really useful would be to open up the ability to
annotate the buildd logs more widely.  I've often felt that the buildd
logs would be a lot more useful if they linked into the BTS more often.
Other things would be handy but the ability to say "Package X on arch Y
is failing due to bug #Z" would really help with scanning the logs.

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: pgpQBW7XjtfM2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: