[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: security in testing



* Matthias Urlichs (smurf@smurf.noris.de) wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> 
> > There is no shortage of opinions about what "we" should do, but there is
> > unlikely to be any action until an "I" arises who actually does the work.
> > This has been discussed over and over with the same result each time
> > (i.e., no action).
> 
> Two answers:
> (a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.

False statement.

> (b) Before I do something like that, I'd like to get some sort of rough
> consensus that this is in fact a good idea, i.e. nobody has serious
> problems with the approach.

Don't believe anyone has any serious problems with the approach and,
honestly, if you care enough about what other people think to not take
any action on your own chances are pretty good whatever you did wouldn't
get very far anyway.

	Stephen

Attachment: pgpFTAMdTg4VO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: