On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:42:05PM -0400, christophe barbe wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:19:44AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Installing the new libexif package makes the old gphoto2 package > > uninstallable. > > gphoto2 2.0final-4 Depends: libexif5 > > The new version of libexif provides libexif8, not libexif5. Therefore, > > moving the new libexif package into testing breaks gphoto2. This can > > probably be fixed by moving gphoto2 and libexif into testing together, > > but there are currently too many packages in the list to try all > > combinations automatically. > Ok If I understand correctly there is nothing I can do to make things > faster. Short of convincing aj that these packages deserve special consideration in the testing scripts because doing so is guaranteed to move a handful of packages off the list (note that I have not verified that this is the case). I don't know how he feels about doing this, though. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp_3wNdDG2Pl.pgp
Description: PGP signature