Martin Schulze wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-leaders.html > > Since I maintain both documents, I already tried. If you can tell me > the date on which Bruce took over leadership from Ian Murdock, I'd be > glad to add. My own investigation didn't reveal a particular date > other than "sometimes in April 1996". Perhaps you just pick the first of the month and say: Apr 1 Bruce Perens became project leader during this month, 1996 > > Under the "Debian releases" area I believe the text of the Infomagic > > message is too harsh. Debian should not be vindictive. I think that > > should eliminated. It was not a real Debian release. At the very > > least it should be softened to be factual only. Perhaps the prose > > from this reference could be a guide. > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/project-history/ch-detailed.html > > So what text are you proposing instead? Literally this: Dec 11 A CDROM manufacturer mistakenly labelled an unreleased version as Debian 1.0, 1995 But that is so long. Perhaps this works. Taking literary license by using today's testing name which I don't think exited then. Dec 11 A CDROM manufacturer mistakenly shipped 'testing' as Debian 1.0, 1995 Bob
Attachment:
pgpKi8Xk6N9Wu.pgp
Description: PGP signature