* Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> [030426 12:21]: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > > > For openssl there is a huge improvement. I was doing benchmarks on > > openssl (they were done for internally at a company I no longer work > > OpenSSL can (and already does) drop in the CPU-specific variants at run > time in an ABI-compatible fashion. This question is obviously off topic for this thread but I am interested... re 'at run time': Does that mean that at compile time there are multiple snippets of functionally-equivalent code compiled to support varied run-time arch's? I have not looked the the OpenSSL code in a while. :) B. -- WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/
Attachment:
pgpgcuoxrAQm3.pgp
Description: PGP signature