* Andreas Metzler (ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at) wrote: > Actually it is much simpler, many packages are simply not compileable > anymore: > > libldap2-dev depends on libsasl-dev [1] > libsasl-dev depends on libdb2-dev (>= 2.7.7.0-7) [2] > libdb3-dev conflicts with libdb2-dev > > [1] introduced in response to #164791 > [2] introduced in response to #168993 > > libtool strikes again, quoting from the report > | /usr/lib/libsasl.la contains -lpam as a dependency, so -lsasl can't be > | linked using libtool without libpam0g-dev being installed. Going back to this I realize I didn't look into this carefully enough. libsasl-dev should not be depending on libdb2-dev, if it is then something's fucked up, and it sounds like it's libtool. I've heard there is work being done to fix this obvious and blatent fuckage so trying to come up with a way to support this is not necessary. Stephen
Attachment:
pgpl4EcsRfFb9.pgp
Description: PGP signature