On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 12:37, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > So, it's safe to say that leaving the .pm files in /usr/lib does not > violate policy? anthony@bohr:anthony$ find /usr/lib -name '*.pl' -or -name '*.pm' | wc -l 312 anthony@bohr:anthony$ find /usr/lib -name '*.pl' -or -name '*.pm' -print0 | xargs -0 dpkg -S | cut -d ':' -f1 | sort -u | wc -l 33 And I don't have that many perl packages installed. "In each of the directory pairs above, the lib component is for binary (XS) modules, and share for architecture-independent (pure-perl) modules." (Perl Policy, 1.3) Either there are a lot of policy violations (yes, I realize that _some_ of those files may be architecture dependent after all), or policy should be changed to accept the above. [ I'm not on debian-perl --- please cc me on replies. ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part