On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:32:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > That's funny. LDBM is by default actually using Berkeley DB for storing > > the data adding just another layer. > > Is this new in OpenLDAP 2.1? If yes, will old ldbm databases be > automatically upgraded to the better format, and why doesn't 'database ldbm' > support the limits keyword unlike 'database bdb'? OpenLDAP 2.0 already used Berkeley DB for implementing ldbm. So far ldbm databases are not automatically upgraded. I am not sure if we should strive to implement that anyway. Regarding the limits keyword - I don't know. Sorry, never tried to use it anyway... Greetings Torsten
Attachment:
pgpnk1WGRwHMy.pgp
Description: PGP signature