Re: should I orphan linux-wlan-ng?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: should I orphan linux-wlan-ng?
- From: Attila SZALAY <sasa@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:45:32 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030401084532.GA31216@sasa.home>
- In-reply-to: <20030401031252.GF14808@alcor.net>
- References: <20030324175044.GA4107@dragon.kitenet.net> <20030324183816.GB1054@apocalypse> <20030325110402.GM31216@sasa.home> <20030401031252.GF14808@alcor.net>
Hi All!
On 2003 Mar 31, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I do not think this is justification for having the kind of module source
> packages that we currently have.
>
> There are few differences between:
>
> cd /usr/src
> tar xvzf module-source.tar.gz
>
> and:
>
> cd /usr/src/modules
> apt-get source module
I talk about packages (like alsa, em8300, lmsensors) where packages have
programs _and_ kernel modules.
And when I upgrade my kernel, I must recompile all the modules but _only_
the modules.
Because of it I need a way to recompile it. And -source packages and
make-kpkg give me the solution.
And it's icing on the cake that make-kpkg set the include patch rights.
--
PGP ID 0x8D143771, /C5 95 43 F8 6F 19 E8 29 53 5E 96 61 05 63 42 D0
GPG ID ABA0E8B2, 45CF B559 8281 8091 8469 CACD DB71 AEFC ABA0 E8B2
Szeretem a Zsanit - SaSa
Reply to: