On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:29, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Why is this a problem but not binaries under /usr/lib? > > There are less of them. So you propose to declare a lot of packages buggy just because it's not completely trivial for you to create a list of the /usr/share executables they contain?