Re: libtool crap [Re: SDL c102 transition]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:38:51AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> That would be a stupid thing to do. Why not just campaign to have a
> tiny change to libtool added to declare that Linux *really can* recurse
> shared libraries as expected. You'd have to check with every libc + ld
> version combination of course, and provide ample regression tests.
> Nobody's bothered to do this yet, so the libtool upstream understandably
> play it safe.
> If you do, I'll happily patch Debian's package and campaign for the
> patch upstream.
Lets do this for Debian and if it works submit it upstream. If you let
me know once this is in Debian's libtool I'll rebuild KDE using it.