Re: The current (not existing) PAM policy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:58:50PM -0800, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 12:29:40AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > administrator is a step backwards, not forwards. Currently the
> > administrator can intervene if need be, albeit with some awkwardness,
> I don't think it's particularly awkward or difficult to just dpkg-divert
> the files after installation, myself.
dpkg-diverting conffiles is the way to hit scary code paths that
apparently don't work properly, so I certainly don't recommend that
approach. Just edit the conffiles directly.
(The awkwardness I meant was what Sebastian referred to: you have to
edit a number of files to make a policy change, not all of which may
necessarily even be installed yet.)
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]