On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > You'll make m68k unusable with this migration at this time. binutils > is broken, gcc-3.2 doesn't build and the outdated version for m68k > generates wrong code for at least bash and coreutils above -O0. Go > ahead and remove m68k from the architectures which will be releasable > for sarge. > - The binutils testsuite currently fails 46 out of 99 tests. One > grave bug report is outstanding. I'm currently down to 10 failures, > but there should be 0. > - gcc-3.2 doesn't bootstrap since December. In unstable, bootstrapping > in woody does work. binutils and gcc-3.2 aren't going in yet. > - bash and coreutils are miscompiled at -O1 and above. These are known > failures. How many are unknown? coreutils isn't going in yet, bash is. > I don't know, which versions of the above packages will be moved to > testing. So my arguments may be invalid against the migration of m68k > packages to testing (but I didn't read about m68k exceptions in your > announcement). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature