Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr> writes:
> Are you saying the bug should have been fixed first, and the package removed
> later? xbreaky had a xlib6g bug and I had it removed, but not because of the
> silly little xlib6g bug.
No, not at all. I was just saying that one was an exceptional case.
Maybe I should have made it more explicit that I wasn't counting that
one among the 4 (actually the 4 became 2 because I made mistakes on a
couple of them).
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card