Re: glibc bugs
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:18:37PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Said excerpt lists two excuses:
> > Uh, no, I see:
> > Testing Status
> > * Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
^^^^^^
> Hmm, I do not think the "out of date on m68k" message was there when I
> looked.
It probably wasn't; out-of-date-on-arch messages are only listed after
the package has been around for at least a day, since that tends to
clutter up the listings for no real purpose.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Reply to: