[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Future of Debian !uncertain

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:32:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> this makes me think, couldnt a flavor just be some set of debconf
> defaults? that way it could be burned onto a cd, and a package doesnt
> need anything extra to support the flavor idea.

Reread my original message; it *can't* just be this. Flavours need to be
more powerful -- they at least need to interract with dselect/aptitude
to allow you to only list some subset of packages, and to change the
effective priorities of many of the ones that are shown.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpPAITpHulnK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: