Re: Missing or incorrect section in packages
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030222005255.GA65272@bsd2.csie.ntu.edu.tw>,
>>>>> Chuan-kai Lin <cklin@debian.org> writes:
> In that case we should better fix Policy appendix D.2.9, which said
> "These fields may appear in binary package control files, ..."
Policy appendices are not normative.
manoj
--
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to
chance.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: