[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Missing or incorrect section in packages



On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 08:52:55AM +0800, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> > Policy is actually fairly clear about it in secrion 2.1.7:
> >     The section and subsection for each package should be specified in
> >     the package's `Section' control record. However, the maintainer of
> >     the Debian archive may override this selection to ensure the
> >     consistency of the Debian distribution.
> 
> In that case we should better fix Policy appendix D.2.9, which said
> 
> "These fields may appear in binary package control files, ..."

I've committed a s/may/can/ change.

For the record, the language of appendices such as that one is not generally
considered to be suitable for interpretation as the proper parts of the
Policy (i.e. the must|should|may rules may not apply).

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Reply to: