Joey Hess wrote: > Me too. I think it makes sense to have separate packages for the last n > editions, where n is some reasonable number like 2 or 3 (sometimes we > get behind in our magazine reading). But after that, why not just one > big package for all the back issues, if they must be packaged? That's an interesting thought. One disadvantage of a archive of issues is that it would have to be redownloaded everytime an a new issue is added to the archive. Though separate issues do increase the size of the Packages file, they reduce the need to download updates to multi-megabyte archives. > > Would it make more sense to instead make an installer that can download > > desired issues? (The same installer could then be used for Linux > > Gazette, ridding us of many packages.) To my thinking, there is benefit to having local Debian mirrors containing the contents versus relying on the continued presence of a single upstream node. And while I'm sensitive to the size of the Debian archive (I host rsync mirrors of the archive on two networks), I'm not convinced there is a benefit in "ridding us of many packages." > It makes more sense for me to just use a web browser, but whatever. :-) Web browsers are fine if you have an fast, persistent internet connection. I often travel with my laptop without network connectivity. -- Kevin Rosenberg | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal GPG signed and encrypted | `. `' Operating System messages accepted. | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgpVpKeIc1k0m.pgp
Description: PGP signature