Re: mICQ roundup
Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 01:27:31PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:26:39PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> > So this version only obfuscates the message. Who says the next version
>> > won't include pre-compiled code for a whole function?
>> I've said this to Manoj and I'll say it to you. Judge an obfuscated
>> message that was sneaked past a maintainer like you'd judge an
>> obfuscated message that was sneaked past a maintainer.
> Why did Ruediger obscure the message that was printed? It could have
> been in plaintext and the maintainer still wouldn't have noticed it.
> Ruediger doesn't seem apologetic for his actions.
> IMHO it's a small step for him to do something malicious from here.
> Firstly it might be something small like deleting your mICQ
> configuration. After that, who knows?
And maybe I should call 911: I've heard my neighbor having a
dispute, may be they will kill one another next time. Who knows?