Hi, On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:26:39PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > So this version only obfuscates the message. Who says the next version > won't include pre-compiled code for a whole function? I've said this to Manoj and I'll say it to you. Judge an obfuscated message that was sneaked past a maintainer like you'd judge an obfuscated message that was sneaked past a maintainer. Not like something malicious to the user's system or data. That's an entirely different class of action. Frankly, it worries me that some people have such a hard time making the distinction. Are /you/ always on the border of doing something truly malicious after you slightly passed the line of what's considered acceptable behaviour? I sincerely hope not. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | emile@e-advies.info tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
Attachment:
pgpQjl5JmpBC5.pgp
Description: PGP signature