[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package



On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:38:02PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:10, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Bad analogy.  A more appropriate analogy is "he stole a candy so we won't
> > > allow him in a sweet shop".
> > If so, the usual punishment for stealing a candy is to be lectured about
> > it, told the right way to behave, and to pay the dollar or so it would've
> > cost, not to be forbidden from ever entering a sweet shop again.
> In the UK there is a common policy of banning delinquent children from the 
> center of town (the shopping area).  

May I ask how many children are declared delinquent after stealing their
first candy bar? I assume we're going to move onto the poisoning children
analogy, or the grafitti one, or something else now.

(We ought to require analogy licenses.)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpQ8wacD1s6o.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: