[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:04:39PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:24, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> > Yes you are when you say that next time he'll do worse "this boy have
> > stole a candy, we should kill him because next time he'll do worse"
> Bad analogy.  A more appropriate analogy is "he stole a candy so we won't 
> allow him in a sweet shop".

If so, the usual punishment for stealing a candy is to be lectured about
it, told the right way to behave, and to pay the dollar or so it would've
cost, not to be forbidden from ever entering a sweet shop again.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpEl_Dcijwoq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: