Hi, On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:33:28AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:00:10AM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > Let's judge the offence at hand and not speculate about the perpetrators > > mind set and the possible future much worse offenses resulting from that. > > > This sounds *way* to much like "Sure he wasn't guilty of /that/, but I'm > > estaaablishing a pettern of behaaaviour here, y'r honor". > > This is not a court of law, and we do not have to deliver justice to an > upstream who has already fucked over our users once. I disagree. I think that we should do justice to anybody, whenever we're capable of doing that. Speculation over when or if Rüdiger would actually insert /dangerous/ code is beside the point and we should not base any of our actions on it. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | emile@e-advies.info tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info
Attachment:
pgp2UXiVOhQP3.pgp
Description: PGP signature