Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:55, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote:
> I do not put any attributes on you personally, since i do not know you
> good enough. However i find your accusations and the other accusations
> about "rm -rf <whatever>" silly.
Why? It's been done before.
> However, allow me two more questions:
>
> 1) What would have happened when the program had refused to compile if
> EXTRAVERSION had not be set.
The people involved would have continued argueing about it.
> 2) What would have happened if Martin had decided once again that
> EXTRAVERSION is either useless or not worth to set and removed the ifdef
> Checks from the Code?
Then Ruediger would have eventually taken his case here and madkiss would be
getting the flames.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: